“You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me, yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life.” John 5:39-40
To begin my little exposition of the things that will make up the heart of this new ministry, I must begin with the term “Christocentric”. Christocentric simply means “Christ Centered.” I place this first because it is of the utmost importance. Take out Christ and there is no Christianity. As we see in Jesus’ statement recorded in John 5:30-40, Christ is at the center of God’s revelation. The books that we commonly call the Old Testament were written to prepare the way for Christ, pointing forward to the coming messiah. Then we have the Gospels that declare that the messiah has come. Finally there are the Epistles that look back to the coming of the messiah, working through how we should then respond to this history changing event. The beginning of the story is the Father creating everything through the Son and the end depicts all of creation being restored back to Him through the Son. He is described in scripture as the author and perfecter of our faith, the alpha and omega, the king of kings and the suffering servant, he is both the lamb of God and the conquering lion of Judah. I don’t think there are many churches that would not acknowledge that Christ must be center in all that we do. It is easy to say that as a church we are Christocentric, but working out what that really means is a different story.
When a church says that it is Christocentric, it must first elaborate on what “christ” is center. Almost every heresy found throughout church history had christ at the center of their theology or at least gave him a high position. The Gnostic heresy of the 2nd through 4th century was very christ centered. The problem is that the “christ” they had at the center was a carrier of a divine knowledge, who came to free the divine spark within men from their physical prisons created by the evil demi-God Yahweh. Some Gnostics even denied that Jesus had a physical body. Sure christ was central for the Gnostics, but that christ was far from the 2nd person of the Trinity incarnated as the Man Jesus of Nazareth. There are so many christs out there. There is the Jesus of Mormonism that focuses on a christ that is an example to us, as our oldest brother, the first of the heavenly father’s spirit children. There is the christ that came as our great investment broker, coming to make all of us rich and prosperous as long as we are good people and we invest in his kingdom which happens to be a certain church or ministry. There is the christ that came as a 1st century hippie, showing us how to live in harmony with each other, care for the environment, and get along with people of other religions. You get the picture, there are a lot of christs being thrown around, so making sure we have the true Christ is as important as being Christocentric. I have heard it said “in the begining God made man in His image and since then man has been trying to return the favor.” We can be fully man centered in our ministry, yet take our own desires and image, slap the term Christ on it, and feel that we are a Christocentric ministry. When I say that we are Christocentric, I am talking about the eternally begotten Son of God, incarnated as the man Jesus, who died as a propitiation for the atonement of our sins, and now sits at the right hand of the Father restoring all things back to Him, patiently awaiting the final judgment of all creation.
Another important qualifier when talking about being Christocentric is what aspect of Christ is center. “The way of Jesus” is a popular mantra for churches that are reaching people in my generation. What they mean by this is that they focus on Christ as our great example. When they claim that we should be walking in the “way of Jesus” they are being fully biblical. Jesus walked this earth as the perfect human, He walked this earth in the manner in which we were intended to walk. The problem occurs when we allow this to be central in our focus on Christ. The Person of Christ, not the example of Christ, is the “way” to God. Dr. Tim Keller once said that “the Gospel is good news, not good advice.” The good news is found in the work of a person, not the advice found in His example. Our ministry, our lives, and our hope must be in the person and work of Christ, not in our ability to emulate the life of Christ. Am I saying that we then should not seek to follow the “way of Christ”? By no means, what I am saying is that in order to be fully Christocentric we must have the whole of Christ as center, His life, His death and resurrections, and His Glorification. On the other hand there are many churches that focus only on the “doctrine” of Christ. Christ may be center in these churches, but only the theological implications of Christs atonement are recognized. It is almost as if Jesus is some one we study, not someone we have an intimate relationship with, follow, and model our lives after. I could go on with examples, but the point is that when we seek to be Christocentric, we must seek to place the whole of Christ as center. I remember studying the Ethiopian Coptic church a few years ago. It was interesting to see how differently the Ethiopian church depicted Christ from how we commonly depict Christ in the west. They regularly referred to Christ as the King of Kings, Lord of Lords, the Conquering lion of Judah. Their art depicted a glorified Christ as a warrior king. They would often depict Him as a powerful African man in Kingly robes, prepared to judge the earth with a sword in hand. This is so different than how we often depict and talk about Christ in the US. We like the earthly suffering servant. We talk about the lamb of God, and love the stories of Jesus with the little children. We usually depict Jesus as a frail Scandinavian hippie, kneeling broken in prayer. Who is right, the Ethiopians or the Americans? I think both are right and both are wrong. First Christ was neither African or Scandinavian, he was a Jew from the tribe of Judah, but what He looked like really doesn’t matter. The important thing is that Christ is both the suffering servant and the King of Kings. Affirming the teaching of the scriptures the counsel of Chalcedon stated that Christ is both truly God and Truly man. As biblically orthodox Christians we must acknowledge the full nature of Christ. He was a man who walked this earth, loved the unlovable, suffered, and died on a cross. But He is also the eternal Son of God, risen from the grave, seated at the right hand of the Father, and will stand as judge over the whole creation. Christ is both the slain lamb and the conquering lion.
It is critical that we not just say we are a “christocentric” church, without truly seeking to place the whole of Christ at the center of all that we do. To be truly Christocentric is to have the historical, biblically revealed Christ as the center of all that we say and do. We must have the Person and work of Christ as the end focus of all we preach, do, and say. Our hope must lie in the faithfulness and sufficiency of the Person and work of Christ. Our lives and our ministry must be modeled after Christ, since He lived as the prototypical human, He is our only perfect example. So as a Christocentric church plant we will seek to care for the poor, love the unlovable, fight injustice, seek reconciliation, and stand against the false religious institutions of the world as Christ did. But we will also proclaim the death and resurrection of Christ, pointing people to the person and work of Christ as our only hope for redemption. We will both follow Christ as our “Rabbi” and fall on our face before Him crying out “my Lord and my God.”